How to package, price, onboard and report AEO for your existing clients, whether you run an SEO, content, PR or marketing agency.
By Gabriel Stanciu, Co-Founder, Bekon AI.
Adding AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) to an agency means selling one more outcome to the clients you already have: being named inside AI answers, not just ranked in search results. You package it as an audit, a set of fixes and ongoing monitoring on top of the work you already do, price it on scope, and report it with Share of Voice across the AI engines your clients' buyers use.
The demand is already in your inbox. In January 2026, 35 percent of US consumers started product discovery in an AI tool, against 13.6 percent in a search engine, according to a Similarweb consumer panel. And roughly 68 percent of US Google searches ended without a click in early 2026. Your clients feel both numbers. They just don't have a name for it yet. This guide shows how to turn that into a service: what to include, how to price it, how to onboard and report, and how to run it without adding headcount.
AEO builds on the work your team already does, especially if SEO is part of it. Clean structure, strong topical authority and machine-readable markup help a page rank, and they help an AI engine quote it. What changes is the outcome you measure and a few new layers of work.
| You already do | What changes for AEO |
|---|---|
| Keyword research | Prompt research: the full questions buyers ask AI, by buying stage |
| Rank tracking | Visibility tracking: whether each AI engine names or cites the client, per prompt |
| Technical SEO | Adds llms.txt, AI crawler access and entity signals to the audit |
| Content optimization | Answer-first pages: the direct answer in the first hundred words |
| Link building | Earning mentions on the sources AI engines already cite |
That overlap is the pitch. Nothing you've built gets thrown away. It gets measured in a second place, one your competitors probably aren't reporting on yet.
Every AEO engagement comes down to three jobs: find out where the client stands, fix what's holding them back, and keep watching as AI answers change. Build your packages around how much of each you take on.
| Package | What you deliver | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Foundation | Baseline visibility audit across AI engines, technical AEO fixes (schema, llms.txt, crawler access), a prompt set by buying stage | Clients testing AI search for the first time |
| Growth | Everything in Foundation, plus monthly answer-first content, competitor benchmarking and source outreach | Clients in competitive categories |
| Always-on | Everything in Growth, plus scheduled re-scans, alerts on material changes and a standing monthly review | Clients who treat AI search as a core channel |
Keep the scope explicit in every tier: how many brands, how many AI engines, how many prompts and how many pages you'll fix each month. Those four numbers drive your cost, and they're what the client is really buying.
There's no reliable market rate for AEO yet, so don't borrow one. Price from your own delivery cost instead.
A tight first month earns the retainer. Here's the order that works:
Use the same prompt set every month. If the prompts change, you can't tell a real shift in visibility from a change in how you measured it.
Don't open with the acronym. Open with the answer. Ask ChatGPT the question their best customer would ask, on the call, and show them who it recommends. If it isn't them, you don't need a slide deck.
Then connect it to what they already pay you for: the same foundations, measured in a new place, with a clear first month of work.
Partly, and that's the point. AEO runs on SEO foundations, but it's measured by whether the client appears inside an answer, not where they rank in a list. A client can hold a top organic position and still be missing from the AI answer to the same question.
Discovery is already moving. Gartner projected that traditional search volume could fall by about 25 percent by 2026, a forecast rather than a settled figure. Either way, the buyers are asking AI today.
Gartner described generative AI tools as “substitute answer engines” for traditional search. Read Gartner's forecast.
Show the baseline from week one and re-scan the same prompts every month. Visibility, Share of Voice and citations either move or they don't, and the report shows which fixes shipped in between.
Keep the report short and comparable month to month:
AEO isn't only for SEO shops. Each kind of agency already owns a piece of it:
The packages, onboarding and reporting in this guide work the same way. Start with the piece of the loop your team already does best, and partner or use a platform for the rest.
If your team already does SEO or content, it has most of the skills. The gaps are narrow and learnable on a live client:
Pick one pilot client, run the four-week onboarding, and write down what you learn as your internal playbook. Our glossary and free GEO guide cover the vocabulary your team will need.
Doing all of this by hand means typing prompts into six AI engines, one client at a time. Bekon runs the loop for you: it measures, diagnoses, ships the fix, and keeps tracking, across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek and Perplexity.
Agencies run on the Enterprise plan, from
AEO isn't a new agency. It's the agency you already run, measured in the place buyers now start. Package the audit, the fixes and the monitoring, price on scope, report the trend, and start with one pilot client this month.
There's no reliable market rate yet, so price from your own delivery cost: the number of brands, AI engines, prompts and pages you fix each month. Charge the baseline audit and first fixes as a one-off setup, and monitoring as a monthly line on your existing retainer.
No. AI engines can answer the same question differently from one run to the next. Price on the work you deliver, track the same prompt set every month, and report the trend in visibility and Share of Voice.
You need a way to run your clients' buyer questions across the AI engines and record who gets named, every month. Doing it by hand doesn't scale past a client or two, which is why agencies use a platform like Bekon to measure, fix and monitor in one place.
Yes. Content agencies already write the answer-first pages engines quote, PR agencies already earn mentions on the sources AI trusts, and performance agencies can report AI search as a channel. Start with the part your team already does, and use a platform to measure the rest.
They overlap. AEO shapes content so answer tools cite it, and GEO works on how often generative tools mention a brand. In client work they're usually sold together as one AI visibility service.
Run AEO for every client from one account
See how Bekon measures, fixes and monitors AI visibility across your whole client list. Book a demo
Enterprise from 99 a month, white-label reporting included.